Reviewer Guidelines

Role of Reviewers
Peer reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal. By providing constructive and objective feedback, reviewers help authors improve their manuscripts and assist the editorial team in making informed decisions.

1. General Responsibilities

  • Provide a fair, unbiased, and timely review of the manuscript.

  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.

  • Avoid any personal criticism of the author.

  • Declare any potential conflicts of interest before accepting the review assignment.

  • Refrain from using or sharing any information obtained during the review for personal advantage.

2. Review Process

Reviewers are expected to:

  1. Assess the quality of the research — relevance, originality, significance, and contribution to the field.

  2. Evaluate clarity and structure — logical organization, coherence, and readability.

  3. Examine methodology — appropriateness, rigor, and reproducibility.

  4. Check data and interpretation — accuracy, validity, and support for conclusions.

  5. Identify ethical issues — plagiarism, data fabrication/falsification, inappropriate citations, or research involving unethical practices.

3. Structure of Review Report

Reviewers should structure their feedback into the following sections:

  • Summary: Brief overview of the study and its main contribution.

  • Strengths: Highlight positive aspects of the manuscript.

  • Weaknesses: Identify areas that need improvement with specific examples.

  • Suggestions: Provide clear and constructive recommendations for improvement.

  • Recommendation: Select one of the following:

    • Accept without changes

    • Accept with minor revisions

    • Major revisions required

    • Reject

4. Review Timeline

  • Reviews should be completed within 2–4 weeks of accepting the assignment.

  • If more time is required, contact the editorial office immediately.

5. Confidentiality

All manuscripts and related materials must be treated as confidential. Reviewers must not share, discuss, or cite the manuscript before its publication without the explicit permission of the editor.

6. Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that could be perceived as influencing their review. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.

7. Ethical Standards

The journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. Reviewers are encouraged to familiarize themselves with COPE’s Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Acknowledgment
We greatly appreciate the time, effort, and expertise that reviewers contribute to the journal’s editorial process. Your role is essential in upholding the quality and credibility of our publications.