All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to ensure they meet the journal’s scope, formatting, and ethical guidelines. Submissions that pass this stage are assigned to at least two independent reviewers under a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field. They evaluate manuscripts for originality, scientific rigor, clarity, and contribution to the discipline.

The possible review outcomes are:

1. Accept without revisions

2. Accept with minor revisions

3. Accept with major revisions

4. Reject

Authors are notified of the review results and, if revisions are required, must submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeframe. The editorial team will verify that all reviewer comments have been addressed before making a final decision.

The editorial board reserves the right to make the final decision on manuscript acceptance based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the journal’s editorial policies.